In which study was the failure to protect subjects from deductive disclosure noted as the primary ethical violation?

The Harvard "Tastes, Ties, and Time (T3)" study is recognized for its significant ethical concern regarding the failure to adequately protect subjects from deductive disclosure. This involves situations where the identifiable information about subjects can be inferred from the data collected, resulting in potential harm or invasion of privacy.

In this case, the study's methodology did not sufficiently account for the risks associated with revealing sensitive information about participants. As a result, researchers noted that individuals could potentially be identified based on the data they provided, which raises serious ethical concerns regarding confidentiality and the protection of vulnerable populations involved in research.

The attention drawn to this ethical violation emphasizes the importance of ensuring that all research involving human subjects includes strong measures to protect their privacy and confidentiality. It serves as a crucial reminder to researchers about their responsibility to safeguard participant information, particularly in studies where the risk of deducing personal details exists.

While other studies like the Milgram Experiment or the Stanford Prison Experiment are often discussed in the context of ethical issues, they primarily center around informed consent and psychological harm rather than the specific concern of deductive disclosure. Similarly, Harlow's Attachment Study, while also controversial, is not noted for this specific ethical violation.